|
Untitled
A Better Definition of Peace
and Ecology
Do
you want to learn a definition of peace or ecology that is more
useful than what most people currently have? Most people think of peace as either
the absence of war, or as inner peace. Most people think of ecology as taking
care of the natural environment. But a life-support systems view of peace
described in the essay below provides a
more comprehensive definition of peace and security. Since your goals and dreams
depend on the stability of your community, environment and political system, the
bottom half of your goals and dreams is the stability of these life-support systems. One benefit of this
new way of thinking is that you have a fuller, clearer idea of what it
takes to feel at peace and be secure, since you need all these systems to be in balance. A second benefit is that you see
peace, security and a clean environment not as something ‘out there,’
something far away, but instead you see them as ‘underneath you,’ as a
foundation that you must keep strong for you to reach your goals. This makes for
a stronger sense of connection, as the distance between the big picture of the
world and your personal world is reduced.
What Your Life
Depends On
by Tim Cimino
Like other animals
that must pay attention to their environment by watching for
predators and storing food for winter, our survival requires that
we pay attention to our environment. The primary difference
between humans and other animals is that we have many more
environments to keep track of.
For example, lower animals such as sponges and worms only
have a physical environment, and higher animals such as tigers and
apes have, in addition, a social environment, including a power
hierarchy to which they must pay attention.
But our lives can be affected by economic changes, local
and international political changes, strife in the community, and
environmental pollution in addition to our social hierarchy and
physical surroundings.
Instead
of calling all these “environments” let's start calling them
“life-support systems.” That will allow me to use the word environment
only for our natural world and ecosystem. These life-support
systems include our bodies, our minds and emotions, our
close personal relationships, each of which constitutes a system,
and nonpersonal relationships (those interactions with people we
don’t know personally.) To be successful in these systems, we
must be able to do at least two things: First, we must be
sensitive to the objects and persons and the changes that they
undergo; and second, we must respond to these changes by acting in
balanced and integrated ways.
Since we weren’t born with
senses that automatically register changes in the economy or
political system, we need to learn ways to sense what is
going on, or we else we may be caught off guard. In a complex
information-saturated world, we must decide what particular
information to pay attention to.
For instance, just listening to the evening news is not
enough.
Also, since we weren’t born with the instincts for
understanding the economy or political system, we need to learn
skills for adapting ourselves to the systems, or for influencing
the systems to better meet our needs. The following “Two
Tables” model provides a way of understanding how our happiness
and survival depend on various life-support systems.
The Two Tables
Model
Pretend that your
important life goals and dreams could all be put in a box.
That box would be supported by four pillars: your personal
health, your mental health, your personal relationships and your
ethics or spirituality. If
any one of these systems fails, for example, your health, it would
be like pulling out one of the pillars.
When any pillar is pulled out, the box tips over and your
goals and dreams go with it.

Now imagine a second
tier of four pillars beneath the ones just mentioned.
These pillars would be the environment, the community, the
political system and the economy.
If any one of these pillars crumbles, again your goals and
dreams, and possibly even your life are lost, too.

In other words, all of
the eight life-support systems are essential to your long-range
fulfillment and survival. Since
a peaceful, stable world is the foundation on which you lead your
life, the “bottom half” of your goals and dreams is a
peaceful, stable world.
That’s why
peacemaking, volunteering, and other actions that improve the
world are not just nice things to do. They are part of the purpose
of your life since they stabilize the foundation, the “bottom
half” of your personal dreams.
Incidentally,
the above drawing would be more accurate if there were many little
tables on the larger table. These
would represent the many other people in the world, dependent on
the four life-support systems we have in common.
Of course the drawing can be further refined, since we have
many political systems and many more communities, but one overall
physical environment, and one mostly interconnected world economy.
Perhaps even another pillar could be added that would
represent the news media and Internet—and all our other sources
of information.
But all of the other life-support systems have their own
information network and protocols: our bodies have nervous
systems, the government has departments that publish its
proceedings, our communities have their own formal and informal
channels for spreading news, etc.
Those
wanting concrete examples from each of the life-support systems
can look at the Ecological
Lifestyle Assessment.
To
better appreciate the Two Tables Model, it helps to contrast it
with a model that many people unconsciously use. This is a model
in which you first address your needs, then those of your
family, then occasionally those of your community, then rarely
those of the world beyond.
There are several
subtleties to this “Four Circles” model that are worth
pointing out: First, it puts you and your goals at the center.
This is something all our egos appreciate even though we are not
really the center of the world.
Second, it puts your family and loved ones around you. This
is equally cozy. Third,
it makes doing volunteer work in the community seem like “extra
credit,” like an optional bonus. It also makes reaching all the
way out to the world something that only rare souls do, the
Gandhis, Mother Teresas, and Martin Luther King, Jrs., of the
world.
The
Two Tables Model is more realistic than the Four Circles Model.
You are not at the cozy center of the world.
Instead, your life and your dreams depend on certain
pillars. Therefore, maintaining the community and other vital
life-support systems are not options, but essentials.
The Two Tables Model gives you a clearer picture of what
you need to help keep stable in order to reach your long-term
goals and happiness.
Most
people when asked to define peace will give one to three meanings:
the absence of war, the absences of conflict, or spiritual peace.
But the Two Tables Model provides a superior and more
complete definition of peace, since we can’t really have peace
without health, good relationships, a clean environment, and the
rest of the eight life-support systems.
The Two Tables Model also points the way to peace:
Peace is achieved by returning your life-support systems to
balance. For these
reasons, the Two Tables Model is an upgrade over the way most of
the people now living on Earth think about peace.
Two
Tables Model yields a further insight.
Many concerned people are sensitized to causes one at a
time. For instance,
they might start by donating to organizations helping people
afflicted with a particular genetic disease, and years later they
might become politically active, and later in life they might
support preservation of the rain forests.
Looking back, they might even become proud of their evolution
towards being more compassionate.
But if you locate these causes on the Two Tables diagram,
you realize that they each make up only a small part of the
body, political and environmental pillars respectively.
In other words, the Two Tables Model puts these efforts in
perspective: they are small pieces of the whole domain of
possible transformations to greater caring. In our lives,
sensitization to different issues usually takes place one issue at
a time. Equally, these
sensitizations can all be seen as installments on one unitary
transformation, to “a care for all.”
Another
way to express this is to imagine inviting one speaker from each
charity needing funds or volunteers to speak at your house of
worship or your place of employment.
The first few speakers who come might rouse some commitment
and action, but as more speakers arrive, each with yet another
worthy cause, the audience would become overwhelmed and have less
and less to give. If
the speakers continued back-to-back, the audience would either
shut down emotionally or have to jump to a higher level and find a
comprehensive solution.
By
pondering that your life and everyone’s life depends on the Two Tables,
you can understand how our life-support system are, in essence,
the bottom half of our goals and dreams.
It might help you place greater value on volunteer action
and charitable giving, and even greater value on the integrated chain
reaction approach described on this web site.
|